Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 201 - 220
of 983
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
NATIONAL MEDICAL IMAGING, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
The court, in turn, delegates that job to its Bar Bureaucracy: The Character and Fitness Committee and Board of Bar Examiners comprise the Office of Bar Admissions. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:10 pm
There is usually 'no better evidence of the state of one’s health” than the medical opinions from the patient’s current treating doctor.' (Gunn v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:40 pm
The plaintiffs assert that not only does this violate the ADA, but also state laws/guidance in those jurisdictions providing that businesses are required to allow individuals who cannot wear masks due to a medical condition to enter the premises, without the need to provide the business with documentation of their inability to wear a mask for medical reasons. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
To date, though the pandemic is a global health and economic phenomenon, the pandemic-related securities litigation activity has been limited to the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Corina-Chernosky v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 157 AD3d 1067, the Appellate Division said that "To be entitled to workers' compensation benefits for an occupational disease, a claimant must establish a recognizable link between his or her condition and a distinctive feature of his or her occupation through the submission of competent medical evidence". [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Corina-Chernosky v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 157 AD3d 1067, the Appellate Division said that "To be entitled to workers' compensation benefits for an occupational disease, a claimant must establish a recognizable link between his or her condition and a distinctive feature of his or her occupation through the submission of competent medical evidence". [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:52 pm
Alldredge, 783 F.3d 197 (5th Cir. 2015) the Fifth Circuit upheld the Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners (TBVME) requirement for an initial in-person examination to establish a VCPR. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:36 pm
Indeed, in one of the seminal residency cases, Whittell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
That is the question that John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, examines in the following guest post. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm
" Hardy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
If medico-legal opinions are within the scope of the practice of medicine, then a potentially important method for curbing unscrupulous expert witnesses and false or exaggerated opinion testimony might consist of peer review actions through professional associations or state medical boards. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
The video evidence, likely eyewitness testimony, and medical testimony based on the official and private autopsies will all support the conclusion that Mr. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
Allen v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
The medical examiner's office released Charles's body to McNabb of Redmond Funeral Home on July 28, 2015…. [read post]
29 May 2020, 6:00 am
Rytlewski was “familiar with the standards of acceptable professional practice for [decedent’s] heart procedure in the Davidson County area,” and that the “Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners had granted Dr. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am
In Gibbons v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
Part V addresses three arguments against universal mask wearing. [read post]
