Search for: "State v. Born" Results 201 - 220 of 5,572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm by Ilya Somin
Second, immigrants and their descendants have been essential in reducing the scope of affirmative action in the United States over the last 30 years…. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
That is the great pity; especially in cases like this where the application of great principles can perpetuate gross injustice borne on the bodies of those least able to bear them. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
If the State Department was absolutely certain that applicants born in India and China who filed in April 2012 would receive their green cards, it would not have needed to retrogress dates back to August 15, 2007. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm by Bona Law PC
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm by CoL .net
The application and reiteration of which was recently seen in Enka v Chubb and Kabab-ji v Kout Food Group. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm by Bill Marler
Benson, V. and Merano, M.A., “Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey 1995,” VITAL HEALTH STATISTICS, SERIES 10 (Nat’l Center for Health Statistics 1998). [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:43 am by David Super
  Nine years after Bakke, McCleskey v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Michael Kagan
Anytime a person moves into the state or a new baby is born, the state may be on the hook for providing social services. [read post]