Search for: "State v. Cherry"
Results 201 - 220
of 666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
The South African High Court judgment in the case of amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2019] ZAGPPHC 384 is a victory for privacy rights. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 1:52 am
This is a Right to Work for Less state! [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
Moore’s legal team accuses the state of cherry picking some higher IQ scores. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
Moore’s legal team accuses the state of cherry picking some higher IQ scores. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
Moore’s legal team accuses the state of cherry picking some higher IQ scores. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 5:09 am
2013, State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
Since plaintiff essentially alleges that defendants “provided inadequate and ineffective representation,” the claim is “properly treated . . . as sounding in legal malpractice” (Cherry Hill Mkt. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
In People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:58 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), section 921.137, Florida Statutes (2009), and Cherry v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
United States of America v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or regulatory… [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:01 am
Imagine the difficulty for competitors – are fire engine, cherry, ? [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 8:00 pm
Lakey v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:20 am
Facts: This case (Freeman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:17 am
Today, in the National Law Journal, two former Supreme Court Justices spoke out; Former Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court Ruth V. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:54 am
Fourth, Marselle argued that the two new file reviewers on the appeal ignored evidence of Marselle’s limitations and “cherry-picked” helpful evidence. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
Knorr v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:32 am
Cowger v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:06 am
Part of the problem here is that the plaintiffs cherry pick their cases, and ignore inconvenient details. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 3:25 am
Williams v. [read post]
