Search for: "State v. D. H."
Results 201 - 220
of 3,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2022, 11:49 am
Pal v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:30 am
United States, in which the petitioner argues that under the Fourth Amendment, “[h]is general acquiescence to a search of his bag … did not extend to the destruction of his personal property,” the court could “bring greater clarity to one’s constitutional rights during a consensual search. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d 239, 246 [2014] [brackets and citation omitted], quoting State Finance Law § 8 [1]); as the state's chief fiscal officer, he has "legally mandated duties to prevent unauthorized payments and overpayments" of state monies (Matter of Martin H. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d 239, 246 [2014] [brackets and citation omitted], quoting State Finance Law § 8 [1]); as the state's chief fiscal officer, he has "legally mandated duties to prevent unauthorized payments and overpayments" of state monies (Matter of Martin H. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 12:25 pm
Silvious v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
Stephen H. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:19 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 9:06 am
D’Annunzio v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
Cir. 1996)(en banc), rev’d, Crawford–El v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 4:54 am
*State v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm
United States, No. 6:15-CV-01517-AA, 2023 WL 9023339, at *1 (D. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:05 am
§ 2710(d)(7)(B)(v-vii). [6] 25 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:05 am
§ 2710(d)(7)(B)(v-vii). [6] 25 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:46 am
§ 1057(h); Trademark Rule 2.71(d). [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm
Robert V. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
WELLMARK, INC. d/b/a WELLMARK BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF IOWA, and WELLMARK HEALTH PLAN OF IOWA, INC. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:35 am
Henry v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 5:06 pm
Earp (Florida, Brevard County), in Arcadier v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm
Forty other states plus the Multistate Tax Commission supported Supreme Court review of the Nevada v. [read post]