Search for: "State v. Dam"
Results 201 - 220
of 549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2020, 5:45 pm
In the case of Studio Monitori and Others v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 3:46 pm
Faced with a similar issue in TVA v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is Sierra Club, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
” According to Pamela King at Greenwire (subscription required), the justices also “will not take up a case concerning state water quality certifications for pipelines, dams and other federally permitted projects. [read post]
30 May 2020, 5:29 am
Cranford (Reserved Water Rights)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPamela J. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 10:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Layman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 11:11 pm
Suing China in a US court: Notes from the Green Dam copyright case CYBERsitter, LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:49 am
Bush and Munaf v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:29 pm
Associate Director & Fellow at the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law Flooding from Hurricane Katrina constitutes a taking of property without just compensation by the United States government, according to a recent decision from the United States Court of Federal Claims in Saint Bernard Parish Government, et al., v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:06 am
Even the Supreme Court has held in State of MP v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 2:41 pm
In Lee’s Ford Dock, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
The Court applied the New Jersey v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 7:20 am
A similar case involving a frustrated permit to build a dam is found in Hart v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
., v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 6:17 am
-Cayman Islands Branch v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Last week, in Hendrix v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Last week, in Hendrix v. [read post]
Case o' The Week: First Impression, Depression - Cervantes and Cali "Mandatory Supervision" Searches
25 Jun 2017, 8:13 am
Jaywalking is dangerous.United States v. [read post]
