Search for: "State v. Homer" Results 201 - 220 of 267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
Still, if even Homer sometimes nodded, then Professor Volokh too may occasionally make a mistake. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Notably he criticised Lord Bingham (“even Homer nods”, he remarked) for what he said in Ullah v Special Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26, at paragraph 20: a national court subject to a duty such as that imposed by section 2 should not without strong reason dilute or weaken the effect of the Strasbourg case law. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 5 February 2018 there was a statement in open court in the case of Homer v Hollingsworth  before Jay J. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reminds IPBiz a bit of Game 7 of Mets v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:43 am by Andrew Hamm
In contrast, Barnett pointed to the Court’s 1896 decision in Plessy v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 2:27 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
Thompson sued for damages under Section 1983, which allows individuals to sue state actors for violating their constitutional rights. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:20 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
That California judge, featured in Time Magazine,[v] is William W. [read post]