Search for: "State v. Mains"
Results 201 - 220
of 10,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2017, 10:15 am
This is the first court challenge to a physician-only law since the Supreme Court made clear in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 11:30 am
–Garnier v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:39 am
The Maine decision will now be reviewed by the Maine state courts, but the Colorado decision is scheduled for oral argument in a matter of weeks. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 9:58 pm
The dispute with respect to whether insurers may recoup costs of settlement has moved north to the State of Maine. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 1:37 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 10:40 am
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear oral arguments on Missouri v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:17 am
In Doughty v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
District Court for the State of Maine issued an order granting a motion to suppress evidence in United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:50 am
Back in 2008, I posted an entry about the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maine finding that evidence from the Kelley Blue Book is admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(17), which provides an exception to the... [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am
On 23 November 2015 the Supreme Court heard a two day appeal of the decision in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 1608. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:47 am
From Does 1-6 v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 2:25 am
Working at home is not a reasonable accommodation for a disabled supervisorKvorjak v State of Maine, CA1, 259 F.3d 48 Sometimes granting a disabled employee's request to work at home constitutes a reasonable accommodation of his or her disability. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am
The Supreme Court reversed fewer than 50 percent of the cases from only three states — Maine, Vermont and Puerto Rico (treated as a state for the purpose of this analysis). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Comer (2017); Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:47 am
The unstated premise is that our current tax laws that treat online, out-of-state purchases different from offline purchases at bricks-and-mortar stores is unfair to Main Street businesses. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 9:25 am
Additional Resources: Diviney v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
Kaitlin Ainsworth Caruso (University of Maine), Abortion Localism and Preemption in a Post-Roe Era, SSRN (2022): In Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm
The trend actually started in the wake of the ACLU’s nationwide public records requests on location tracking and the 2013 U.S. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
Gregoire, the main argument is that the state's felony disenfranchisement law violates Section 2 of the VRA. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:07 pm
(1) As in Bates v. [read post]
