Search for: "State v. Major" Results 201 - 220 of 44,457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 12:42 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
On May 16, Justice Thomas issued the majority opinion in which the Supreme Court held, by a 7-2 vote, that the CFPB’s funding mechanism comported with the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution which states, in relevant part, in Article I, Section 9, Clause 7: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law…” Specifically, Justice Thomas held: “Under the Appropriations Clause, an appropriation… [read post]
22 May 2024, 8:30 am by Unknown
Marquez (Major Crimes Act; Venue Clause) Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Whatever one’s view about the constitutional status of reproductive rights for women, reading what Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion in Dobbs said about Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
The court distinguished the facts from its prior decision in PPG Industries v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
We can expect this to be challenged in upcoming proceedings, but, with a large and growing majority of UN member states recognizing Palestinian statehood, that challenge is unlikely to succeed. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  Justifying Hamas's murderous pogrom by saying Israel deserved what it got is nothing less than supporting a terrorist organization – the same as blaming the United States for 9/11. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am by Becky (Hyun Jeong) Baek
Cline’s counsel (perhaps unwisely) spent the large majority of his time trying to convince the Court that the LP Agreement “was not signed” by Cline, an argument going nowhere fast. [read post]