Search for: "State v. Malcolm "
Results 201 - 220
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
First, in Marley v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
Now drinkers can enjoy the IPKat's football prowess via Greek decoders Breathlessly back on the blog after this morning's envigorating copyright and trade mark law training session with a bright and bushy-tailed batch of trainees, this Kat now turns to the main news of the moment, today's momentous ruling of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:01 am
From lawprof Rick Hasen's Election Law Blog, the latest brief in a case we've been following, Carrigan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
Dans un tel cas, la validité d'une demande est affectée par des événements postérieurs à son dépôt. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
Re Inquiring Minds I wrote to Malcolm & Co. and cc him for your convenience. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 10:56 am
” The other states: “All men are created equal, they are endowed by their CREATOR. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:22 am
In this week’s case (Bialkowski v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am
Carter **Jennifer Lipinski is a law student at Michigan State University. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am
Carter **Jennifer Lipinski is a law student at Michigan State University. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
For those of you who have taken Civ Pro, then you’re probably reminded of another case brought against Satan, United States ex rel Mayo v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:20 pm
What this book does not do is to warn the casual reader that it is confined to the experience, the history and the analysis of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm
Supreme Court decision (Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:55 pm
(People v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 2:37 pm
Legal culture and the state in modern Japan: continuity and change Setsuo Miyasawa and Malcolm Feeley11. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term: former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
Waxman representing i4i, and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stuart arguing as amicus curiae on behalf of the United States in support of i4i. [read post]
