Search for: "State v. Mems" Results 201 - 220 of 668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Baptist Mem’l Hosp., 995 S.W.2d 569, 571 (Tenn. 1999) (relying on Restatement (Second) of Torts § 580 B (1977)). [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Allen, __ U.S. __, No. 07-395, 2007 WL 4248619 (Dec. 5, 2007) (mem.); Schwab v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:42 pm by Steve Kalar
  (They'll feel good about themselves while serving their revocation sentences).United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 3:04 am
Santulli v Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P.C., 78 NY2d 700, 708 [1992]; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v Enco Assoc., Inc., 43 NY2d 389, 394-395 [1977]). [read post]