Search for: "State v. Stokes"
Results 201 - 220
of 417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2023, 8:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:01 am
The State on appeal argued that “Coleman did not provide Stokes with any mitigation, and such mitigation may have been harmful to Coleman‘s case. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:42 pm
Today, Drew Boortz has an interesting post on the Michigan Film Office granting a 40% refundable tax credit for the development of a video game, the first time this has happened in the state. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Stokes v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:55 am
In FDA v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 4:48 am
Oral argument will be had today in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
The defendant in capital case Stokes v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 9:46 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court has stated that the typicality requirement is sometimes equated with the fourth requirement of adequacy of representation. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:30 am
For example, in Transparent-Wrap Machine Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 am
In November 2020, the DOJ filed a complaint against big cat exhibitors Jeffrey and Lauren Lowe (of “Tiger King” fame) for AWA and Endangered Species Act violations (United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
In 1925, in its decision in Gitlow v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:19 pm
Roberts, Jr., as the Court was about to wind up its hearing on Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
20 Apr 2025, 12:37 am
Equality & Human Rights Commission: Statement on Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:21 pm
Mich.) today in Kelly v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 8:39 am
Defendant successfully challenged the award as excessive and, in Fortune v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Accord, e.g., Stokes v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
[Case Reference: Mary Stokes (on behalf of her son John Stokes) v Christian Brothers’ High School, Clonmel and The Department of Education and Skills 7 December 2010 Equality Officer Decision DEC-S2010-056)] Related PostsNovember 5, 2010 -- Underspending on Schools: Violating the Right to Education? [read post]
