Search for: "State v. Strickland"
Results 201 - 220
of 869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 11:23 am
Defense counsel’s performance was deficient in the punishment phase of a capital murder trial because counsel failed to conduct an adequate investigation into the mitigation case as well as into the State’s aggravation case Andrus v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 3:35 pm
See Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. at 476, 478; United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
” Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
Wednesday, in Lafler v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:38 pm
That’s the meat of the holding from Padilla v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 11:28 am
In Siehl v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
First, Strickland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
The Court denied relief in Strickland, but then in a couple of more recent cases (Wiggins v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 10:32 am
The parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred by: (1) holding that the warrant to search the defendant's cell phone violated the Fourth Amendment's particularity requirement, see People v Hughes, 506 Mich 512, 538 (2020); (2) failing to sever any valid portions of the search warrant from any invalid portions, see People v Keller, 479 Mich 467, 479 (2007); (3) holding that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule did not apply, see People v… [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
” Strickland v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:10 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:00 pm
§ 2254(d) and Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:05 pm
In a sort of unusual procedural backdrop, the petitioner in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:27 pm
VacaDocket: 10-387Issue(s): (1) Whether a state court of last resort can effectively create a new category of per se prejudice for ineffective assistance of counsel by ordering a new penalty-phase trial due to counsel's failure to consider presenting mental health evidence the court admitted was as likely to have harmed defendant as to have helped him; and (2) whether a state court of last resort can disregard the admonition of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:46 am
Ct. 1446, 1455 (2009) — two years after the state courts had rejected Winston’s Strickland claim. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm
Ct. 1446, 1455 (2009) — two years after the state courts had rejected Winston’s Strickland claim. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:02 am
This Monday this Texas Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Strickland v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
