Search for: "State vs. Jones" Results 201 - 220 of 328
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by Don Asher
  For more, read: The Importance of Accident Site Location for Personal Injury Claims in Indiana and Illinois; The Jones Act vs. the Longshoreman and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act for Maritime Workers; and Work Injuries and On-the-Job Accidents in Indiana and Illinois With Federal Law Protections: FELA, Jones Act, LHWCA, DBA. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Section 24 (2) states that if evidence is obtained in a manner that infringes an individual’s Charter rights the evidence shall be excluded. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 22, 2009)Affirming that multiple plaintiff claims of discrimination etc were frivolous and that a plaintiff's attorney engaged in sanctionable conduct; remanded $660K+ atty fees order for more refined computation of amounts>> Noted here: Central Ohio Employment Law Update7th Circuit>> Jones v City of Springfield, No. 08-2085 (7th cir. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:56 am by kevin-vonkamecke
Davidson’s conclusion, she states that often the choice is charity vs. government. [read post]
20 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Delaware – State Auditor Loses Bid to Have Procurement Charge Dropped MSN – Randall Chase (Associated Press) | Published: 5/17/2022 A judge refused to dismiss a criminal charge accusing Delaware’s embattled state auditor of deliberately breaking up payments for a contract she entered into with a former campaign consultant in order to avoid compliance with state procurement law. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
To be sure, there were scientists who looked carefully at the IARC’s stated bases and found them inadequate, inconsistent, and incoherent[8]. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 6:26 am by Andrew Appel
Also election officials in our state argue that people cannot accurately count ballots by hand and claim to prove that in every post-election audit. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
"Ø April 1, 2009 decision hereØ SCOTUS docket hereØ SCOTUSwiki hereØ Noted here: Jones Day; Mintz Levin; Ogletree DeakinsArgued - Awaiting Decision AT&T v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
EU General Court explains how the relevant assessment is to be undertaken | High Court employs ‘intention to target’ approach to determine application of EU/UK law in online trade mark infringement case | There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]