Search for: "Steven Barrett"
Results 201 - 220
of 276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
The Office's agreement with Quadrangle expressly does not cover former Quadrangle Managing Principal Steven Rattner. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rig [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:07 am
Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Barrett dissented, as did Justice Alito with regard to the content discrimination question. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
Barrett) Ohio Northern University Claude W. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:42 am
Perry Stein and Devlin Barrett report for the Washington Post. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
Barrett Prettyman, Jr., John G. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 4:56 am
Steven Aristil and Harold report for Reuters. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am
Potential Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett described aspects of horizontal stare decisis in a 2003 article for Notre Dame Law Review. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
With Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s recent confirmation having cemented a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, perhaps the abortion right will soon be overruled. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 4:57 am
Rashbaum, Devlin Barrett, and Jonah E. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 8:40 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:00 am
Stevens always denied wrongdoing and was never charged with a crime. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Writing for herself and three colleagues, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that the Arizona Supreme Court’s distinction did not contradict prior Arizona law because no previous case had presented the question “whether a ‘significant change’ occurs when an intervening decision reaffirms existing law, but rectifies an erroneous application of that law. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 10:44 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 8:36 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Oral arguments are even harder to read these days because the arguments very often run well beyond their allotted times (and thus Justices say so many things it’s hard to know what each Justice cares most about).But even though we’ll all just have to wait until June or so to really know what will happen in Moore, many commentators are suggesting that there appears to be a majority (Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson for sure, and quite possibly Chief Justice… [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 4:44 am
Leonnig, Devlin Barrett, Josh Dawsey and Spencer S. [read post]
