Search for: "Steven V. Lawyer & Associates"
Results 201 - 220
of 885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2018, 10:26 am
National Employment Lawyers Association of New York, Amicus Curiae.Counsel: [*1] Bergstein & Ullrich, LLP, New Paltz (Stephen Bergstein of counsel), for appellants.Law Office of Mark E. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
., Broadcom v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that “[t]he logical result of [Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent] … would be a system where lawyers decide what is best for clients and ignore their wishes—where, in effect, a defense lawyer acts as judge and jury. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:23 am
” Briefly: For the Associated Press, Mark Sherman and Jessica Gresko report that “[s]pring is the season of mystery at the Supreme Court,” and that one “puzzle this year concerns an unusual appeal the Trump administration filed more than six months ago, calling out ACLU lawyers as dishonest in a dispute over a pregnant teen-aged immigrant who wanted an abortion,” in Azar v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
Steven Mazie covers “this showdown over presidential power” for The Economist. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
Constitution Daily offers highlights from the career of retired Justice John Paul Stevens in honor of Stevens’ 98th birthday last Friday. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 7:25 am
On April 11, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Steven Schmitz et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:16 pm
Doing so has intimately acquainted me with Dassey’s case (and his co-defendant, Steven Avery) alongside the many legal issues associated with his case. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
And because I am the client as well as the lawyer, I have no reason to keep the draft confidential. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am
” Two months after the oral argument in the Wisconsin case, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am
” EJI focuses on this week’s cert denial in Hidalgo v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:20 am
Briefly: At Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro and Marcia Coyle report that according to Steven Anderson of the Pacific Legal Foundation, the PLF’s “formula” for a successful cert petition, like the one in property-rights case Knick v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:29 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
Commentary comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog. [read post]
