Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 201 - 220 of 20,230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2018, 3:43 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Commentators have treated the Court’s decision in Whitford v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 5:25 am by Ronald Mann
Still, with those caveats, it is pretty hard after this argument to see the Justices forcing Manning’s suit into federal court. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:10 pm by Jason Mazzone
I listened today to the Supreme Court’s first ever telephonic oral argument, in USPTO v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Justice Thomas also wrote separately to disagree with the court’s severability analysis (Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Neiman, that the Court seems to be “holding” for now and that the Court could use in the event Moore turns out to be moot and the Justices still want to weigh in on ISL.Importantly, deciding whether Moore is truly moot may take the Court some time (and could involve the Court asking for additional briefing, as it did when the North Carolina Supreme Court first granted rehearing two months ago). [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm by Cary Coglianese
Justice Stevens’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:05 pm by Ronald Mann
  Unfortunately, only three Justices voted in favor of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Petrella v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
As stated by Chief Justice Wagner, our courts should provide “good justice for everyone, not perfect justice for a lucky few. [read post]