Search for: "Strauss v. Strauss"
Results 201 - 220
of 538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2022, 6:37 am
Posted by Kerry Berchem and Charles Smith, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, on Wednesday, May 11, 2022 Editor's Note: Kerry Berchem is partner and Charles Smith is a consultant at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 10:30 pm
For example, in Strauss v Microsoft Corporation [USDC SDNY, 91 Civ 5928], a federal district court allowed a former Microsoft employee, Karen Strauss, to introduce E-mail messages between Microsoft workers as evidence of sexual harassment. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 10:30 pm
For example, in Strauss v Microsoft Corporation [USDC SDNY, 91 Civ 5928], a federal district court allowed a former Microsoft employee, Karen Strauss, to introduce E-mail messages between Microsoft workers as evidence of sexual harassment. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
” See, e.g., Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:55 am
From an extended examination of Chadwick LJ’s judgment in Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, which expressly raises ‘fairness’ on the basis of relevant conduct as the criterea by which share of interest should be assessed, in the absence of express agreement, and Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, which appears to limit ‘fairness’ and expressly concerned shares in a property in joint names, where Oxley v Hiscock concerned a… [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:02 pm
Levi Strauss & Co., 799 F.2d 867, 874-75 (2d Cir. 1986); Sports Auth. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:01 pm
Emerging questions, the panelists noted, include the effectiveness of NSA tactics, the balance between civil liberties and safety, the definition of search and seizure in the 21st century, the 1979 Supreme Court case of Smith V. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
On October 26, Geoffrey Stone, University of Chicago Law School, will deliver The Warren Court v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:33 pm
BY JOHN ROEMER *** Just days after the Dobbs v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
The California Supreme Court ruled today in Strauss v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In that regard, the Second Department cited the First Department’s 2016 opinion in Strauss v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:17 am
One recent example is Romer v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 7:19 pm
Strauss Notes CPR: How Jacobsen v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:00 pm
09/04/09 hunter of justice, by law professor Nan Hunter:As Professor Hunter observes, Yes on 8 successfully opposed the Campaign for California Families (CCF) when it sought to participate in Strauss v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:51 am
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:13 am
Justice Moreno dissented in Strauss v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:51 pm
Weideman Earlier today, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Strauss v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:40 am
Until June 6th, Bishop et al v. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 9:33 pm
”This, the Ninth Circuit found, was based on a misreading of Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:07 am
Maybe Team Strauss/Anziska needs to refocus its efforts and give Senators Boxer, Grassley, and Coburn a call.Gomez-Jimenez v. [read post]
