Search for: "Sullivan Co. v. Wells" Results 201 - 220 of 378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
First, the Greens (owners of Hobby Lobby) have alleged that their religious beliefs include a belief in treating employees well, a belief they practice by, among other things, offering quality health care to their employees. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am by Ronald Collins
            Question: In many respects, this is an inside account of the struggle to preserve and perpetuate New York Times Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copied from Balkinization.Harvard Law Review Symposium 2014: Freedom of the PressA conference in celebration of the 50th anniversary ofNew York Times Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:04 am by Joy Waltemath
The High Court noted that the actual malice standard in the ATSA was patterned after New York Times Co v Sullivan, which requires material falsity, and Congress presumably meant to incorporate it into the ATSA’s immunity exception and did not mean to deny immunity to true statements made recklessly. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
It is well settled that “anticipation is the epitome of obviousness. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Having read many posts by Falkvinge (as well as many law books), I don’t get the impression that he’s actually opened many law books himself. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
As the Court famously noted over seventy years ago: There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any Constitut [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:46 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
For example, in Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]