Search for: "Sun v. Commissioner" Results 201 - 220 of 328
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by INFORRM
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office blog has released its most read stories of the year, having been in the news throughout 2015. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
(a) Greig v Stirling & anr (b) Hamaizia & Anor v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (c)  Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 2:09 am by INFORRM
IPSO 01617-24 Williamson v birminghammail.co.uk, 1 Accuracy, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 05524-24 Lai v manchestereveningnews.co.uk, 1 Accuracy, 2 Privacy, No breach – after investigation 01780-24 A woman v newburytoday.co.uk, 1 Accuracy, 2 Privacy, 9 Reporting of crime, No breach – after investigation 04372-24 Harries v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 04923-24 Mallon v Daily Mail, 1… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy Commissioner of Canada has issued a report on the tension between privacy and data protection and cyber security. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
There was also a report in the Vancouver Sun. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The Independent, Evening Standard, Press Gazette, Metro, The Sun and The Herald covered the proceedings. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Citing Campbell v Acuff and Sun Trust Bank v Houghton Mifflin, District Judge Batts lambasted any contention held by the defendants that 60 Years Later was a work of parodic comment or criticism: "the Court found such contentions to be post-hoc rationalizations employed through vague generalizations about the alleged naiveté of original, rather than reasonably perceivable parody. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  On the same day there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
Events  The Information Commissioner’s Office is holding the Data Protection Practitioners’’ Conference on Tuesday 8 October 2024, online. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  The Sun, whose stories are at the centre of the dispute, has also written about the defence. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 16 July 2019, the Information Commissioner’s Office has open its consultation on the updated draft code of practice. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has launched a public consultation on a draft direct marketing code of practice. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Byline Investigates published an exclusive “A Private Investigator Hired by The Sun to Spy on Meghan Markle and Her Father has Apologised to the Duchess – and the Queen”. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Complaints against the Sun and the Mirror on behalf of convicted murder Levi Bellfield have been rejected (13430-16 Turner v Daily Mirror). [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
On 21 June 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers [2011] EWHC 1566 (QB). [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Toronto Real Estate Board v Commissioner of Competition 2017 FCA 236 the Federal Court of appeal held that new consent was only need where information was used for a new purpose, not where it is distributed by new methods. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Information Commissioner’s Office said a breach notification was reviewed and it was determined no further action was needed. [read post]