Search for: "Taylor's Administrator v. Taylor"
Results 201 - 220
of 900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 am
Supreme Court London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (23 February 2011) Forsyth, R v [2011] UKSC 9 (23 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Daley- Murdock, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161 (23 February 2011) Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Air Lines Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 162 (23 February 2011) Berezovsky v Abramovich [2011] EWCA Civ 153 (23 February 2011) 007 Stratford… [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:20 pm
See Taylor v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 3:42 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cantrell v Wycombe District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 866 (29 July 2008) Bailey v The Ministry of Defence & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 883 (29 July 2008) Blyth Valley Borough Council v Persimmon Homes (North East) Ltd & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 861 (29 July 2008) Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council v Bainbridge & Ors (”Bainbridge 1″) [2008] EWCA Civ 885 (29 July 2008) G, R (on the application… [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act; Administrative Procedure Act) Kialegee Tribal Town v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:50 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crocs Europe BV v Anderson & Anor (t/a Spectrum Agencies) [2012] EWCA Civ 1400 (30 October 2012) McCarrick v Hunter [2012] EWCA Civ 1399 (30 October 2012) Joyce v Epsom and Ewell Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 1398 (30 October 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gregory v Benham [2012] EWHC 2971 (QB) (26 October 2012) Joseph & Ors v Spiller & Anor [2012] EWHC 2958 (QB) (26 October 2012) High Court… [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:07 am
Supreme Court W (Algeria) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 (7 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gedeon Richter Plc v Bayer Pharma AG [2012] EWCA Civ 235 (07 March 2012) Miah & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 261 (07 March 2012) Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 260 (07 March 2012) Zieleniewski v Scheyd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:13 am
’“ Taylor v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
Demand for premium pay where union cannot negotiate a disciplinary procedure a mandatory subject of collective bargainingMatter of City of New York v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, 2008 NY Slip Op 52693(U), Decided on January 18, 2008, Supreme Court, Albany County, Judge Henry F. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm
Taylor (Tribal Courts; Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act) Weiss v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am
Margaret Taylor proposed that Congress change the format of committee hearings for Mueller’s testimony. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:40 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:19 pm
Taylor, 50, Janesville, WI Charge: Warrant (m) FTA Arrested Evelyn D. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
"On another point, the Town contended that Colabella could not “properly raise claims regarding alleged violations of the Taylor Law or as to certain job classification determinations made by the Westchester County Department of Human Resources. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
However, in another decision issued the same day - Taylor v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm
M.B.Z. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
* Taylor Law contract provisions, however, may not adversely affect the layoff rights vested in employees by law. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Case law indicates that a probationary employee may be terminated at any time after the completing his or her minimum period of probation prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation [see Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904] unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14]. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm
Cal. 1947) 161 F.2d 774Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
* Taylor Law contract provisions, however, may not adversely affect the layoff rights vested in employees by law. [read post]
