Search for: "Taylor v. State Bar" Results 201 - 220 of 626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
The district, however, obtained a stay from a state Supreme Court justice barring arbitration because the collective bargaining agreement was silent as to the district’s right to subcontract. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
The cease and desist order can enjoin defendants from certain activities within the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 8:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
 4:45 – 5:00:  Closing Day 2: (presented with the Criminal Law Section, State of Montana) Friday, May 7, 2021 12:45 – 1:00: Opening (Lillian Alvernaz, Indian Law Section Chair; James Taylor, Criminal Law Section Chair; Sam Alpert, State Bar of Montana)  1:00 – 2:45: The Death Penalty in State & Federal Courts Panelists: Michael Donahoe, Deputy Federal Defender, Federal Defenders of… [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
”On appeal, the Court of Appeals -- New York State’s highest court -- made two significant determinations:1. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 7:40 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In other words, the provisions dealing with disciplinary action set out in the collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law were a nullity.In Town of Wallkill v CSEA, Town of Wallkill Police Department, 19 NY3d 1066, the Court of Appeals said that the discipline of police officers "may not be a subject of collective bargaining under the Taylor Law when the Legislature has expressly committed disciplinary authority over a police department to… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:13 am
"A [Taylor Law] contract may … prohibit disciplinary action in the face of pending criminal charges. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
When he later attempted to challenge his dismissal by filing a petition pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, he found that he was time barred. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
FEC (07-320), Taylor v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:12 am
The court said “the simple answer is that, as Chief of a Town police force, [Wade] was not a State employee. [read post]