Search for: "Treas" Results 201 - 220 of 316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2013, 10:36 am by Greg Jenner
We do know, however, that the IRS included a 10% safe harbor as part of the bonus depreciation regulations (Treas. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:10 pm
O mandado de segurança destaca que, caso aceite a convocação, o governador estaria comprometendo a autonomia constitucional do Estado de Goiás e o princípio federativo, cláusula pétrea da Constituição. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:09 pm
Trata-se, ressaltou, “de emanação direta do princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana, signo do estado de direito e de civilização avançada e, por isso, cláusula pétrea da Constituição”. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:07 am by Stanley D. Baum
Since the ability to select a lump sum option is available only during a limited window period, increased benefit payments will result from the proposed plan amendment, and as such are a permitted benefit increase under Treas. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:46 am by admin
The appellate panel also addressed the “in perpetuity” requirement of Treas. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:14 am by Administrator
The preamble to the regulations explain the various ways that new Treas. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:52 am by Jon Gelman
It currently has 72 bipartisan cosponsors and has been endorsed by the following military and veterans organizations:Air Force Association (AFA)American LegionAmerican Veterans (AMVETS)Association of the United States Navy (AUSN)Burn Pits 360Disabled American Veterans (DAV)Fleet Reserve Association (FRA)Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA)Military Order of the Purple HeartNational Military Family Association (NMFA)Non-Commissioned Officers Association (NCOA)The Retired Enlisted… [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
See IRC § 7701(a)(1). [2] IRS Pub. 594; see also IRC § 6321. [3] IRC § 6322 [4] IRC § 6502 [5] See IRC §6502, 6503 [6] IRC §6323. [7] IRC § 6323(f) . [8] As to a Judgment Lien see Treas. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:54 am by alicia.baker
 In Mohamed, a prominent California entrepreneur and philanthropist who everyone seems to concede contributed over $18,000,000 in real estate to qualified charities, received zero charitable contribution deduction because of his failure to comply with the substantiation requirements of Treas. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:54 am by alicia.baker
 In Mohamed, a prominent California entrepreneur and philanthropist who everyone seems to concede contributed over $18,000,000 in real estate to qualified charities, received zero charitable contribution deduction because of his failure to comply with the substantiation requirements of Treas. [read post]