Search for: "U. S. Patent and Trademark Office"
Results 201 - 220
of 390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2017, 1:23 pm
Trademark opposition filings increased in 2016, according to a recent report released by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 1:23 pm
Trademark opposition filings increased in 2016, according to a recent report released by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
Homeland Housewares, LLC (“Homeland”) petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) for an inter partes review of claims 1–16 of U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 6:24 am
This time around, the Court holds that the First Amendment prohibits the Patent and Trademark Office from denying patents that may disparage or bring into contempt or disrepute any persons, living or dead.The case is Matal v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm
From Justice Alito: The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) denied the application based on a provision of federal law prohibiting the registration of trademarks that may “disparage . . . or bring . . . into contemp[t] or disrepute” any “persons, living or dead. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:54 am
Summum, 555 U. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:34 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC 16-712 Issues: (1) Whether inter partes review, an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to analyze the validity of existing patents, violates the Constitution by extinguishing private property rights through a non-Article III forum without a jury; (2) whether the amendment process implemented by the PTO in inter partes review conflicts with Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
The post Japan Patent Office Reverses Initial Refusal... [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:32 am
Fraud occurs when the applicant “withhold[s] from the Patent and Trademark Office ... material information or fact which, if disclosed to the Office, would have resulted in the disallowance of the registration sought or to be maintained,” or makes “a deliberate attempt to mislead the PTO into registering [the] mark by presenting materially false and misleading information to the PTO when ... seeking the trademark… [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:11 pm
Patent and Trademark Office rendered judgment that there was no interference-in-fact between the claims in interference between the Regents of the University of California/Berkeley and the Broad Institute. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:22 am
& Trademark Off. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:46 am
S. 530, 533; U. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
First, a suit to enforce the statutory right to exclude is not exempt from the antitrust laws if the infringement defendant shows that the patent was obtained through fraud on the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
The Federal Circuit’s conclusion that Congress’s ministerial change overruled this Court’s longstanding precedent is incorrect for at least two reasons. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 3:55 am
A recent application before the United States Patent and Trademark Office sought to register the mark The Beachhouse, A Wine by Douglas Green (in standard characters) for wines in International Class 33 on the Principal Register. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 5:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office is involved. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:21 pm
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:21 pm
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
