Search for: "U. S. v. Samples" Results 201 - 220 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
"Continuous" has been defined as "[u]ninterrupted; unbroken, not intermittent or occasional; so persistently repeated at short intervals as to constitute virtually an unbroken series. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:20 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Myriad further asserts that these transformations are “central to the purpose of the claims,” id. at 1347, because “Myriad’s method claims each require the transformation of a tissue or blood sample in order to isolate the patient’s DNA. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:34 pm
Dismissal after testing positive in random drug test later declared inoperative by the Appellate Division ruled lawful*Matter of Goldin v Kelly, 2009 NY Slip Op 30646(U), March 11, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 109751/08, Judge: Eileen A. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
In so doing, the publisher failed to send the article with the largest sample size that was critical of the scale.9  The actual recommendations by the eight reviewers failed to reveal consensus as to how to score the FBS . [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:08 am
In so doing, the publisher failed to send the article with the largest sample size that was critical of the scale.9  The actual recommendations by the eight reviewers failed to reveal consensus as to how to score the FBS . [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
In 2007, Campylobacter jejuni was isolated from 35% of fecal samples from cows at that same dairy in California; the outbreak strain was found in 4 fecal samples from those cows (CDPH 2008). [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 2:26 am
SmithCRIMINAL PRACTICE - Automobiles - U-Turns"Defendant's conviction is affirmed because he turned his vehicle 'around so as to proceed in the opposite direction on a highway' on which a "no U-turn" sign was conspicuously posted, and there is a rebuttable presumption the sign was properly posted. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 4:18 am
App. 2001) ("[U]nder the facts of this case, society is not prepared to recognize as reasonable an individual's expectation of privacy in a blood sample lawfully obtained by police. [read post]