Search for: "U.S. v. Day*" Results 201 - 220 of 1,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2020, 7:51 pm by John Jascob
As a result, the defendant was required to wait out a 30-day period before the court could consider his motion for sentence reduction (U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
And after more careful examination of the merits of the plaintiffs’ federal claims in the federal district court in Wisconsin, the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:28 am by Amy Howe
Roberts repeatedly returned to the question of how the justices should apply their 2016 decision in the Texas case, Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:24 am
This issue of citizenship which challenged free black men in their pursuit to procure patent rights was decided by the Supreme Court in 1857 with Justice Taney’s opinion in Dred Scott v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Chris Wesner
Pa., 418 U.S. 506, 5‐34 (1974) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting); Hanner v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am by Florian Mueller
But it is taken into consideration, and a licensing-based business model certainly doesn't weigh in favor of an injunction, which is why "patent trolls" rarely obtain injunctions in U.S. district court at this stage.While we're on the subject of comparative law, I appreciate Professor Thomas Cotter's latest Comparative Patent Remedies blog post, in which he "certainly agree[s] that 'the German statute falls far short of eBay v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
The ability of federal prosecutors to rely on this statute was recently given a boost by the 2nd Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm by David Super
       Although this promises to be only the third impeachment trial of a president in U.S. history, the Senate does conduct impeachment trials intermittently for other officials, particularly federal judges. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Last term, the Supreme Court voted 5-3 against reviving the nondelegation doctrine in Gundy v. [read post]