Search for: "U.S. v. Hicks"
Results 201 - 220
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 7:45 am
" Hicks v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm
Hicks, 64 F.4th 546 (April 5, 2023). [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
Pa., 418 U.S. 506, 5‐34 (1974) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting); Hanner v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 5:01 am
Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987). [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 7:53 am
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
George Hicks (Kirkland) is counsel of record on the other side. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
In 2006, reportedly at McConnell’s suggestion, Thapar was appointed as the U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Although summary dismissals do have precedential value (meaning that they have to be followed), they lose that force “when doctrinal developments indicate otherwise,” as the Court held in Hicks v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
" 518 U.S. at 495. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm
§ 3553(a) and United States v Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
In May, the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Sheffield v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 7:17 am
Trulock v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
For example, Mathews v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:38 pm
For example, Mathews v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Click Here GWA, U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
