Search for: "U.S. v. Speed" Results 201 - 220 of 2,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:36 am by Daniel Jin
The heavily negotiated bill: (1) extends the period a juvenile can be held from 6 to 8 hours to allowing for additional time to process a detention order; (2) speeds up the arraignment times for youth offenders; (3) provides judges the discretion to use GPS monitoring versus incarcerations for repeat youth offenders (GPS monitoring is not mandatory and is not authorized for first time offenders); (4) eliminates the value of a car as a factor when charging a youth offender with car theft;… [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
The new lending program will waive time-consuming requirements, speeding up the delivery of military aid to Ukraine. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Teresa Chen, Alana Nance, Han-ah Sumner
” Hypersonic missiles—which can carry nuclear or conventional warheads—fly at speeds of at least Mach 5 (five times the speed of sound), faster than conventional cruise missiles. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Lee Reiners
The practical effect of this structure is that cryptocurrency exchanges in the U.S. are not regulated at the federal level (they are required to register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and obtain state money transmitter licenses). [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:06 am by MaxVal
Attobahn Pursues a Patent on a Viral Molecular Network Utilizing Mobile Devices U.S. patent application, US20220117035, relates to a viral orbital vehicle, called the V-ROVER which is one of the access devices of the viral molecular network that is a high speed, high capacity terabits per second (TBps) LONG-RANGE Millimeter Wave (mmW) wireless network. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am by Samuel Bray
Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 433 (2009); Weinberger v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]