Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,030
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2014, 7:40 am
Denying the employee’s motion for reconsideration, a federal district court in California ruled that the new case did not stand for the general proposition that a lack of a uniform policy was a certifiable issue, but rather narrowly held that despite the lack of a uniform policy, the employees’ theory could be proved or disproved (Coleman v Jenny Craig, Inc, February 27, 2014, Anello, M). [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 4:25 am
Plaintiffs again moved to remand the complaint to state court, but the district court denied the motion. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:49 pm
The ruling overturns a 3rd District Court of Appeal decision in favor of Elizabeth Carlisle, a Michigan teen whose ruptured appendix was misdiagnosed on a Carnival ship in 1997. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:21 am
In a class action rails-to-trails takings case under the Little Tucker Act (less than $10,000 per claim, district court venue), the trial court awarded the property owners attorneys fees and costs under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:55 am
Both parties moved for summary judgment and the District Court ruled in favor of the Appellee, answering the above-cited question in the negative.. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
The district court agreed and entered judgment without a trial in the employer’s favor. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
The district court agreed and entered judgment without a trial in the employer’s favor. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:24 pm
Stuart was supported on appeal by the city’s Office of the Attorney General, which defended the D.C. law in question, the District of Columbia Uniform Arbitration Act. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 4:40 pm
In the absence of identification of a policy or practice that affects all members of the class in the manner Wal-Mart requires, the district court’s analysis is not faithful to the Court’s interpretation of Rule 23(a) commonality. . . . [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:43 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. in the case General Electric Company v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
District Court for the District of Columbia (pdf). [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:12 am
With respect to the first issue, the Court of Appeals ruled that Stadium adequately pleaded a fraudulent conveyance claim against Bertram under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“UFTA”), D.C. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
le some Nevada judges currently permit telephonic or audiovisual court appearances by lawyers, litigants, or witnesses, the practice is not consistent between judicial districts or among the courts in the same judicial district. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:05 am
An officer in the Louisville, Kentucky police department this week filed suit in a Kentucky federal district court seeking damages for the Department's four-month suspension of him. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:49 am
The district court found the logic of the Third Circuit in Turner v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 6:46 am
And AARP’s 2013–2014 POLICY BOOK takes the following policy position: States … should enact laws or court rules that … provide clear procedures when wards, their property, or their care has ties to more than one jurisdiction or state by adopting the Uniform Adult Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Jurisdiction Act. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:00 am
In light of Wal-Mart, the district court erred in certifying a class seeking monetary relief under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
Thus, the Court invalidated the Second DCA’s ruling in Landrum and quashed the subpoenas for failing to conform with the Uniform Law. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 6:51 am
The court next examined the district court’s treatment of Rule 23’s commonality and predominance requirements, and found that the district court relied on insufficient evidence to support its finding that these requirements were met. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
In a February 3, 2021 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit determined that the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (“USERRA”) may require employers to provide employees with short-term paid military leave. [read post]
