Search for: "USA v. Cross" Results 201 - 220 of 742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Alexis Lightcap urges the justices to review Doe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Finding that none of defendant's claims have merit, we affirm the the district court's judgment. 08a0012p.06 USA v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:35 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s ruling in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:42 am
Moke USA, LLC, Opposition No. 91233014 (April 21, 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Consequently, so too is the MCRI Defendants' cross-appeal. 07a0343p.06 007/08/28 Parker   v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:38 pm by Claire Poppelwell-Scevak
Despite the recent surge of legalization of same-sex marriage in countries like the USA and New Zealand, it is still far from global acceptance. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
SEB S.A., 563 U.S. 754, 765–66 (2011); see Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 9:45 am by Aurora Barnes
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
(cross-petition asks for recourse on failure to dance) Antitrust Reverse Payments: GlaxoSmithKline, et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
In an August 15, 2013 ruling, Judge Ronnie Abrams granted the cross motions for partial judgment of plaintiff L'Oreal USA, Inc. and defendant Trend Beauty Corp. in L'Oreal's action alleging Lanham Act and state law claims against Trend Beauty. [read post]