Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 201 - 220 of 13,793
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. [read post]
Case date: 13 April 2021 Case number: No. 19-1674 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, February 15, 2019, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:52 am by Jon Gelman
(Response due June 13, 2013)May 30 2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 15, 2013.Jun 10 2013Brief amicus curiae of DRI -The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.Jun 13 2013Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al filed.Jun 13 2013Brief amicus curiae of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. filed.Jul 15 2013Brief of respondents Richard Stengel, and Mary Lou Stengel in opposition filed.Jul 30 2013Reply of petitioner Medtronic, Inc.… [read post]
A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Friday heard oral arguments in Maryland Shall Issue Inc. et. al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:17 am by Mark Engstrom
Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-2197, 12 January 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 6:45 am by Docket Navigator
That PTAB decision is now the subject of an appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 11:25 am
Inc., 2006 NY Slip Op 08638, the New York Court of Appeals considered the following certified questions from the United States Court... [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:06 am by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court denied Microsoft Corporation’s petition for writ of certiorari in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“A123”) appeals from the final de- cision of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts denying A123’s motion to reopen and dismissing its declaratory judgment action against Hydro- Quebec (“HQ”). [read post]