Search for: "United States of America v. In the Matter of the Application of the United States" Results 201 - 220 of 1,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Aaron R. Cooper
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 102, under which any use of the application material within the United States (only) defeated novelty. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
His application for asylum was refused and the Secretary of State sought the exclusion of the appellant. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:32 pm by James Yang
You can certainly copy your original patent application, modify or tack onto the back end of the original application any new features for refilling with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 7:36 am by Gene Quinn
Almost two months ago, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am by Anton Metlitsky
 He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 2:29 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Mary filed her own application in the Irish court to relocate with JMR to the United States permanently. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
  This speech seems constitution under Article V, which requires Congress to call for a constitutional convention for proposing amendments on the application of the three-quarters of the states. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:55 pm by Matthew Kahn
Executive Order on Maintaining American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Various legal changes from the 1980s onwards in the United States have been identified as responsible for making the American legal climate friendlier to patent holders, which in turn has spurred more applications. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm by Michael O'Hear
Ginsburg’s position here recalls her (also unexplained) flip between the Scalia and Breyer camps in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:52 am by Gene Quinn
Just over three years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bilski v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:33 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
R. of Evid. 606(b),” id. at 236, n. 5, and (2) United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
The Board found that the phrase is a common expression of patriotism, affection, or affiliation with the United States of America that will not be perceived as a source indicator. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
Not surprisingly, the US government had concerns when signing the Convention in 1994, declaring then that “nothing in the Convention shall be deemed to require or to authorize legislation or other action by the United States of America incompatible with the provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America. [read post]