Search for: "United States v. Articles of Food and Drug"
Results 201 - 220
of 506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am
Plaintiffs also argue that the listing and warning requirement conflict with, and are preempted by Federal legislation,notably the United States Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
(Pix credit: Marc Frank for Reuters) Even as the United States retreated from direct economic connections with Cuba, the European Union sought to step into the space left by the American action. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
A version of this article originally appeared on Securities Docket. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:06 am
United Foods. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am
United States, in which the justices considered the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:20 am
Yishai Schwartz provided an update on military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 7:11 am
’” Id. at 7 (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 11:12 am
Significantly, at the present time we do not know Merck’s plans regarding any further appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 6:39 am
This Article demonstrates that—as suggested in the dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
If a product is labeled, promoted or used in a manner that meets the following definition in section 201(h) of the Federal Food Drug & Cosmetic (FD&C) Act it will be regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a medical device and is subject to premarketing and post-marketing regulatory controls Even electric toothbrushes are regulated as medical devices, because they are intended to help prevent tooth decay and gum disease. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
” And, more to the point, “[a]n authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:35 pm
That legislative intent was given effect by the Supreme Court in its seminal cases of United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:12 am
The imprecision, however, creates a regulatory problem because the Food and Drug Administration must approve any new drug before it is sold. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case involving mandatory deportation, TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
