Search for: "United States v. Bayer" Results 201 - 220 of 294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 2:22 am by John L. Welch
"And so the Board resumed proceedings and re-set all dates.TTABlog comment: In footnote 5, the Board distinguished this case from Bayer v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Verizon removed the cased to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
– IPO consultation (Class 99) Reform of IP taxation – consultation underway (IP finance) The PCC Page no.8: Last chance to make your voice heard – consultation on the proposed limit on recoverable damages in the Patents County Court (PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches Twitter account (Patent Docs) US Patent Reform ‘Patent reform’ still possible in 2010?!? [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am by Bexis
  Here’s why.We recently blogged about new United States Supreme Court certiorari grants of interest. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:05 am by Antitrust Today
United States Potato Growers of Idaho Inc., et al., No. 10-CV-307-BLW) and the Northern District of California (Marvilla v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:35 pm by legalinformatics
Part IV explores the status of computerized recording systems throughout the United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:32 pm by Phil
On August 24, 2010, Karl Bayer, Special Master, filed his Report and Recommendations to United States District Judge Sam Sparks regarding the construction of claims in United States Patent No.'s 6,514,640 and 5.910,382 in the Hydro-Quebec and The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:10 am by Russell Jackson
The class definition in Philadephia Firefighters was as broad as could be:  "'[a]ll third party payors in the United States and its territories that purchased, reimbursed, and/or paid for all or part of the cost of YAZ dispensed pursuant to prescriptions in the United States.'"  Id. at 2. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:14 pm
Bayer Bioscience N.V., 514 F.3d 1229, 1239-40 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:14 am
Siemens (EPLAW) India: Novartis & Bayer appeals to be heard by the Supreme Court in the next 30 days (Spicy IP) US: House passes patent settlement legislation as part of the War Funding Bill (FDA Law Blog) US: Bilski v Kappos: What effects on biotechnology patents? [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm by Duncan
Siemens (EPLAW) India: Novartis & Bayer appeals to be heard by the Supreme Court in the next 30 days (Spicy IP) US: House passes patent settlement legislation as part of the War Funding Bill (FDA Law Blog) US: Bilski v Kappos: What effects on biotechnology patents? [read post]