Search for: "United States v. Dow" Results 201 - 220 of 530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am by Wells Bennett
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
Rule 702 should have settled the debate over Daubert, as this rule for the admissibility of expert testimony is far stricter than any rule that existed  in any jurisdiction in the United States before Daubert came out. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Bissell
Throughout the United States, the Ebola panic appears to be reaching a, pun intended, fever pitch. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm by Benjamin Bissell
” The report goes on to state that both the United States and Israel have been accused of sabotaging key aspects of the Iranian military in the past in the hopes of derailing Iran’s controversial nuclear program. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Wilt v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:51 am by John Stigi
May 14, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court’s exclusion of an event study as unreliable under Daubert v. [read post]