Search for: "United States v. Goodwill"
Results 201 - 220
of 484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:14 am
Bd. of Cal. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:07 am
Carani, Apple v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:37 am
” At paragraph 29 he stated: “The use of a domain name that is so similar to the name that the plaintiff is known by and has substantial goodwill in (without additional words) would lead a person surfing the web and going to <lawsocietyofbc.ca> to believe, I conclude, that they were going to the plaintiff’s web site or one that was affiliated with the plaintiff” [emphasis added]. [read post]
Precedential No. 15: TTAB Refuses Concurrent Use Registration of DELMONICO'S For Restaurant Services
15 Jun 2015, 3:12 am
Southwestern Management, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
The IPR procedure is only being used against the best United States patents. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:36 am
As the court stated, reiterating Lord Justice Oliver in Anheuser-Buch v Budejovicky Budvar NP, that goodwill is very much "localized" and that "...reputation which may, no doubt, and frequently does, exist without any supporting local business… does not by itself constitute a property which the law protects". [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
People in the United Kingdom cannot receive PCCM's closed circuit service. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:24 am
Beverages Direct sold the product exclusively to retail purchasers located in the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 5:43 am
Bern Unlimited, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
The United States Supreme Court in the case of Welch v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
The case is David Couture v Playdom (Fed. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:39 am
United States Watch Co., 173 Mass. 85, 53 N.E. 141 (1899). [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am
In the United States, under various State legislation, an individual's personality or persona can be protected; something that isn't protectable per say under UK legislation.Some faces are just made for t-shirtsNevertheless, the protection offered under passing off can potentially extend to individuals, at least on a prima facie application of the requisite elements: there has to be goodwill associated with that individual; a misrepresentation as to that… [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:39 am
Hansen In Donahue Schriber Realty Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:58 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
