Search for: "United States v. Louis Means" Results 201 - 220 of 463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:43 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] I am writing this on Friday in preparation for posting on Wednesday. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States" is now up on SSRN. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:33 am
Well:"The United States currently has the greatest number of known centenarians of any nation with 53,364 according to the 2010 Census"Of course, not all of them own life insurance, but even a small percentage means thousands, perhaps tens of thousands do.What then? [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:32 am by Schachtman
If the odds ratio means anything, it is that younger Parkinson’s patien [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:54 pm by Jim Martin
United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), which outlined the limits of free speech, particularly in war time. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:30 am by Nicandro Iannacci
One major argument is the corporate critique, powerfully articulated by Justice John Paul Stevens in his lengthy dissent to the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:46 am by Steven Boutwell
  Under guidance from the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Daimler AG v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
§ 3036(d)): “collect intelligence through human sources and by other appropriate means”; “correlate and evaluate intelligence related to the national security and provide appropriate dissemination of such intelligence”; “provide overall direction for and coordina [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then summarized the case law regarding the required proof:In addition, according to case-law, although it must be proved that a mark has acquired distinctive character through use throughout the European Union, the same types of evidence do not have to be provided in respect of each Member State (...).Furthermore, the Court has repeatedly held that there was insufficient proof of distinctive character acquired through use of a mark throughout the European Union where evidence was… [read post]