Search for: "United States v. Smith"
Results 201 - 220
of 4,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2024, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:31 am
The basic framework is that the Constitution requires all “Officers of the United States” to be nominated by the President with “Consent of the Senate. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:19 am
Georgia from the Supreme Court of the United States, decided on February 21, 2024. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:35 am
United States [quoting the McDonnell case].In the McDonnell case, Roberts found that prosecutors had defined “official acts” too broadly; in the Trump decision, he took the position that prosecutors had considered the question too narrowly. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm
” The major new case was the ground-breaking decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:17 pm
On August 31, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States granted a petition for writ of certiorari in The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:08 pm
United States regarding affirmative defenses. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:40 pm
In a short decision in the Newsday circulation fraud case, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
Smith Marinello v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:59 am
State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:54 am
Nick Smith challenges the United States Department of Agriculture's determination that Smith had converted 2.24 acres of wetland on his property and that he is, consequently, totally ineligible for program benefits. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
In Smith v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 2:37 pm
The court explained that these judges are principal officers under the constitution and thus, must be appointed by the President of the United States rather than merely the Head of Department. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:29 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:27 pm
Yesterday's oral argument at the United States Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:39 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
