Search for: "WILLING v. U S"
Results 201 - 220
of 777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:30 pm
Nation Enterprises, 471 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
The lawsuit — Samma v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:16 pm
The concurring opinion of Justice Alito was brief:We took this case to decide whether willful infringementis a prerequisite to an award of profits under 15 U. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:33 pm
The Court’s decision – Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Hyatt, 587 U. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:30 am
LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Both of these adjustments are based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) published by the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
Flores, 521 U. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
Flores, 521 U. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
Molski v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 10:24 am
[v] Here, we do not seek to describe the precise modalities of the IAAA,[vi] or explore its potential political effects. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:29 am
(The court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 11:07 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Rucho v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
In Doshi v Besen, 2019 NY Slip Op 33771(U) [Sup Ct, New York County Dec. 30, 2019], Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley considered a 50% shareholder’s dissolution petition under BCL 1104(a), and the other shareholder’s dismissal cross-motion, in which the latter argued that the former’s resignation from the board and as an officer resulted in his relinquishment of control over the business, in effect acquiescing in… [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 2:00 am
Kaiser v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:29 am
Here, in Sutherland v Fitzpatrick 2020 NY Slip Op 30029(U) January 2, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 2090/2018 Judge: Lara J. [read post]
