Search for: "Waring, Appeal of" Results 201 - 220 of 471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2013, 6:37 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
(This is Part 2 of 4 posts on the issue of whether the Wiretap Act bars interception of unencrypted wi-fi signals. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 195 F.2d 433, 436 (10th Cir.1952); see also, e.g., Ware v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 3:48 pm by Larry Munn
On appeal, the Federal Court focused on paragraph (c) of the definition of “certification mark” in section 2 of the Trade-Marks Act: “means a mark that is used for the purpose of distinguishing or so as to distinguish wares or services that are of a defined standard with respect to… (c) the class of persons by whom the wares have been produced or the services are performed… from wares or services that are not of that defined… [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:19 pm by Gregory Forman
Ware chose to enter a special appearance and challenge jurisdiction in Alabama she was bound by Alabama’s determination–was anything but obvious to the family court and the Court of Appeals. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:57 pm by Stephen Bilkis
He had a prior Chemung County conviction for marijuana possession which was pending on appeal. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:57 pm by admin
In addition, another illegal lottery offence, section (206(1)(f)), makes it a criminal offence to dispose of goods, wares or merchandise by games of chance (or mixed chance and skill) in which a contestant pays money or other valuable consideration. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
One particular food source appealed to several entrants, for obvious reasons. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 First, the MMMA does not provide for a pot distribution scheme allowing care providers to sell their wares; the Act is quite vague on the subject of transfer and distribution of pot. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 2:26 pm by Larry Munn
A decision from the Federal Court of Appeal, Iwasaki Electric Co. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:05 am by Joe Consumer
But Wal-Mart neither pays its own nor takes responsibility for those who make and move its wares. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:05 am by Joe Consumer
But Wal-Mart neither pays its own nor takes responsibility for those who make and move its wares. [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 9:32 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
As of this writing (late 2017), Google is appealing a record €2.4bn (£2.2bn)fine levied by the EU over search engine results. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:52 pm by paperstreet
  The statute does not define the terms “goods,” “wares,” or “merchandise. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 2:35 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 The decision is being appealed, but libraries go in to that appeal on the winning side, which is always the better place to be. [read post]