Search for: "Waters v. U.s.*"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm
Thus, Velez’s injury did not occur on or over navigable waters. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:25 pm
Plaintiffs, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and several conservation groups, argued that in 2005 the United States Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau) renewed forty-one water service contracts with various water users without conducting an adequate consultation under § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act and that the contracts jeopardize the existence of the delta smelt. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:39 pm
§ 1365(b); and (2) in imposing penalties against Gaston for violations allegedly "wholly past," contrary to the requirement set forth in Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
Ass'n v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 2:44 pm
Department of Water Resources; County of Plumas, et al. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 7:57 am
" National Mining Association v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
(RCRA), ruling in the case of Sherrill, et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:49 pm
Oct. 24, 2007):The parties dispute what constitutes the governing definition of "navigable waters" under Rapanos v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:04 pm
Prometheus Labs, Bowman v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:21 pm
By Jason RantanenTransocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:35 pm
Bernhardt (Indian Reserved Water Rights) Janiver v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:13 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:14 pm
See Dirks v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:42 pm
, v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 7:21 pm
Wild Fish Conservancy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 8:52 am
See, United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:33 pm
The Court of Federal Claims (Claims Court) awarded compensation for the taking of water rights plus interest from the date of the taking. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:38 am
Stating that it drew from the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. [read post]