Search for: "Wood v. United States (two Cases)" Results 201 - 220 of 743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
July 23, 1993); United States v. 789 Cases of Latex Surgeons' Gloves, 799 F. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm by CJLF Staff
Court Rules Illegal Immigrants Have 2nd Amendment Rights:  In the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
The institutions, laws, and regulations of the United States convey control and formulation of trade policy into private hands. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am by Conor McEvily
Much of the news coverage of the Court focuses on yesterday’s grants: In United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:57 am by The Charge
United States, 353 U.S. 657 (1957) in which it afforded broad discovery opportunities in federal criminal cases. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, No. 15-955 (whether IPRs violate Separation of Powers; two amici now filed in support) Post Grant Admin: Click-to-Call Tech, LP v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am by Alex R. McQuade
Andrew Keane Woods commented on the United States’ tendency for creating, incubating, and training future enemies. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
The defendant was convicted of two counts of sexual offense with a child by an adult, rape of a child, first-degree kidnapping, and two counts of taking indecent liberties with a child in Wake County, stemming from the assault of a six-year-old child at a church. (1) In regard to one of the indecent liberties convictions, the defendant argued that the State did not present sufficient evidence that the defendant acted inappropriately when touching the victim’s chest… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm by Jim Martin
Some of the filings submitted to the United States Supreme Court in the original jurisdiction case Texas v. [read post]