Search for: "Doe 35" Results 2181 - 2200 of 17,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
By law, the SEC protects the confidentiality of whistleblowers and does not disclose information that might directly or indirectly reveal a whistleblower’s identity. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:16 am by Matt Osenga
  The Act does, however, have a number of provisions that have already gone into effect. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:43 am by Dennis Crouch
The Patent Act of 1952 left intact a strong definiteness requirement but overturned Halliburton by enacting what is now known as 35 U.S.C. 112(f). [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:43 am by Dennis Crouch
The Patent Act of 1952 left intact a strong definiteness requirement but overturned Halliburton by enacting what is now known as 35 U.S.C. 112(f). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The conclusion of the case was adverse to Abbott: Because Abbott lacks standing, the district court properly dismissed its claim.As to basic law on assignments, the CAFC noted: Transfers of title, otherwise known as assignments, are controlled by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:52 am by Christine Nielsen
  However,  H.J.Res 59, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (“Act”) only delays the pain of sequestration; it does not replace it with a long-term tax and spending deal. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
§ 281, stating: We need not determine whether IT’s legal interest in the ‘247 patent was sufficient to meet the ‘patentee’ requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Formatting data into fields and tagging said data does not describe an inventive data structure according to the Federal Circuit. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:09 am
This period is not extendable.One might ask if a voluntary publication under 1.221 does "count" as a publication under 35 USC 1.22(b) which states in pertinent part:(b) PUBLICATION.-(1) IN GENERAL. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am by Rose Hughes
Notably, § 112, r 6 does not state that the Specification must also describe equivalents of that structure. [read post]