Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 2181 - 2200 of 5,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2017, 10:32 am by Gene Takagi
Scholars and the Congressional Budget Office have estimated bequest giving would drop anywhere from 6 percent to 37 percent. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 7:55 pm
”[1]In 1969, a clear shift away from collective leadership is visibile in discussions about the nature of the Party Constitution, and its role. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:00 am by Robyn Greene
While only 37 percent of poll respondents said that intelligence agencies are collecting too much information, 24 percent indicated that they did not know. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 11:11 am by William K. Berenson
In addition the Uber driver is covered by a $1 million per collision commercial liability policy if he is at fault and a $1 million uninsured/underinsured policy. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 6:51 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
While registration may have some retroactive effects, as under s 11(1) referenced above, it does not attach any interest in the lands until it is registered. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 9:00 pm by clc-admin
While registration may have some retroactive effects, as under s 11(1) referenced above, it does not attach any interest in the lands until it is registered. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 10:46 am
I am bewildered by this fact, but I hope this does not resultfrom a lack of basic constitutional knowledge, or being arrogant, or even a little bit of both. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am by Graham Smith
Although the focus of electronic transactions regimes tends to be on signatures, signatures should not be addressed in isolation from other relevant formalities[1]. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am by Graham Smith
Although the focus of electronic transactions regimes tends to be on signatures, signatures should not be addressed in isolation from other relevant formalities[1]. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
 The standard direction was always: (1) Has the appropriate authority proved that the officer was acting dishonestly by the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people? [read post]