Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Dunn, the court found that Alabama had denied a death-penalty defendant the expert mental-health assistance to which he was entitled under the standard the court established in Ake v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:58 pm
In case of a plane crash, investigators can retrieve the black box and find out precisely what caused the plane to go down. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am
A renegotiated license agreement is my best guess.Finally, here's the amended complaint: 14-10-03 Amended Microsoft v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 12:59 pm
In the 1961 decision, Monroe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 1:25 pm
" Using a heightened scrutiny standard, the Second Circuit did not find appeals to a federally uniform definition of marriage to be a constitutionally persuasive reason for the federal government to refuse to recognize marriages lawful under state law. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:21 pm
That's the Court's square holding in New York v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
” This disclosure was modeled on the temporal standard used for MD&A disclosures under Item 303 of Regulation S-K.[20] The Commission noted support for this approach from numerous commenters and explained: [C]limate risk information can be informative about financial performance in a way that goes beyond current account numbers. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
Even so, the Supreme Court has required that Congress provide a "sufficiently definite and precise" standard that can "enable Congress, the courts and the public to ascertain whether the [Executive official] . . . has conformed to those standards. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm
On Tuesday, I attended argument of Williams v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 4:54 am
Lilly v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 7:14 am
In Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:09 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
Of course, the Fourth Amendment protects us from precisely this kind of general, warrantless search. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 7:12 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:35 am
Bus. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:54 am
For example, in the landmark Carpenter v. [read post]
