Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 2181 - 2200 of 6,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2017, 3:47 am by Jan von Hein
This is not justified by applying the exemption in Art. 17 HCCP in conjunction with § 110 para. 2 no. 1 Code of Civil Procedure, but solely as a result of the commitment of enforcement in Art. 18 HCCP in conjunction with § 110 para. 2 no. 2 Code of Civil Procedure. [read post]
1 May 2017, 12:18 pm
The trial court denied Tanubagijo's new trial motion and sentenced him to 25 years to life in state prison.People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Carmichael and Sefton BC (HB) [2017] UKUT 0174 (AAC) Oh my. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am by Jenny Gesley
The Ordinance was challenged  by a person acting as an accountant for a temple trust before the Allahabad High Court in B Ram Lal v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm by emagraken
This was stated unequivocally by this Court in Danyluk, supra, at para. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm by emagraken
In Semeniuk Acton J. also stated (para. 35): I am of the view on this point, however, that infertility is a type of loss not properly lumped together with the usual non-pecuniary categories of pain, suffering and loss of amenities. [read post]