Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 2181 - 2200 of 6,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2024, 6:36 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The court reasoned that shopping using the employer-provided discount was reasonably contemplated by the employment, as employees were not permitted to shop during work hours and the employer benefited from these discount days by clearing out old products and boosting sales. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am by Kiran Bhat
HR.BLR reports on a recent decision by California’s intermediate appellate court, in the wake of the Court’s recent decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 4:32 am
  The sale of Chrysler was “not a legitimate sale of assets…it was…nothing more than a way for the government to pick winners and losers from among Chrysler’s claimants, as opposed to a forthright attempt to maximize asset value subject to market competition and discipline. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:31 pm by Kenan Farrell
The counterfeit products were observed for sale in the stores by Plaintiff’s representatives and are believed to originate from a common source, to be determined. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:27 am by Marcel Pemsel
ART v OHIM (C-171/06 P): It is necessary, in any event, to reject T.I.M.E. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
" The material presented includes the following [The General Index of Topics and samples from the text are set out below for your review]: General Index of Topics Table of Cases IntroductionAn outline of issues and concerns relevant toSituations involving Sections 207-a and 207-c of theGeneral Municipal LawGeneral Outline Of Cases And Related MaterialsConcerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a,Section 207-c and related lawsThe Full Text of Selected Opinions Selected… [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The minority (Lord Carnwath, Lord Briggs and Lord Sales) would have held that section 32(1)(c) has no application to mistakes of law. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  That has real ramifications in what congress does, v. trade secret/TM b/c those rely on Commerce Clause. [read post]