Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 2181 - 2200 of 13,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Correction is then effected by way of a corrigendum or reprint of the entire specification, see EPC Guidelines C-V 10 (September 2013), last paragraph. [read post]
20 May 2018, 9:16 am
Nesbitt(1st Dept., 5/17/2018)New York CPLR § 3215(c) states:(c) Default not entered within one year. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am by Frank Cranmer
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:03 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The cases in which permission has been granted are as follows: R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & Anor; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP & Anor Cheshire East Borough Council R (Cardiff & Vale University Board & Ors) v Ceredigion County Council & Ors Miller & Ors v Ministry of Justice; O’Brien v… [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 3:43 am by Marta Requejo
The Opinion of AG Wathelet on C-536/13, Gazprom, referred by the Lietuvos Aukšciausiasis Teismas, was delivered yesterday  and reads as follows: (1)      Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as not requiring the court of a Member State to refuse to recognise and enforce an anti-suit injunction… [read post]