Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 29,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2011, 3:11 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Simonoff v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 270–71 (1994) (collecting cases); see also United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
United States Supreme Court distinguishes a law from a regulation for the purposes the federal whistle blower statute Department of Homeland Security v MacLean, USSC #13-984 A federal air marshal publicly disclosed that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) had decided to cut costs by removing air marshals from certain flights. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 12:37 pm
United States is that both Biden Supreme Court appointee, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. and Joe Biden himself, though his Justice Department, think that Congress has limitless power to tax unrealized capital gains or to enact a wealth tax on your net worth. [read post]
31 May 2018, 3:00 pm
§ 1226—the detention authority Congress created for a person awaiting a determination of whether they may remain in the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 2:08 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlBrackeen v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:19 pm
Bernhardt (Land Into Trust) Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 8:35 am
In December, the United States Office of the Solicitor General (SG) weighed in on the petition in Hikma Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:15 am
VLSI Technology LLC, IPR2021-01064 and Patent Quality Assurance, LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 1:01 pm
The doctrine that Congress’ commerce power all by itself limits the state power to regulate interstate commerce is called the Dormant Commerce Clause, or sometimes the Negative Commerce Clause, because any limits are not specifically stated but rather are implicit from the grant of power to Congress. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 1:01 pm
The doctrine that Congress’ commerce power all by itself limits the state power to regulate interstate commerce is called the Dormant Commerce Clause, or sometimes the Negative Commerce Clause, because any limits are not specifically stated but rather are implicit from the grant of power to Congress. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
This morning I attended oral argument at the United States Supreme Court in the maritime case of Dutra Group v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:07 am
Habeas corpus petitions filed in federal court challenging state court convictions became much harder to win after Congress enacted a law in 1996 that said only state court convictions that violate clearly-established constitutional law (as determined by the Supreme Court) may be overturned in a habeas proceeding. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:29 am
In Brown v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 2:55 am
The Dred Scott v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:55 am
The Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 8:09 am
Photo: Giovani V; CC.CONTACT: www.culturalheritagelawyer.com ©2010-2011 Ricardo A. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:03 pm
United States and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 3:57 pm
You know, like when the Supreme Court ruled that abortion rights should be determined through the state electoral process, not by federal courts. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:32 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
