Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 2181 - 2200 of 9,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Indeed, it is this relationship which gives rise to the duty imposed upon the doctor to properly treat his or her patient (see Bazakos v Lewis, 12 NY3d 631, 634; Payette v Rockefeller Univ., 220 AD2d 69, 72; Ellis v Peter, 211 AD2d 353; Heller v Peekskill Community Hosp., 198 AD2d 265; LoDico v Caputi, 129 AD2d 361, 363; see also Speigel v Goldfarb, 66 AD3d 873, 874). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
It upheld the admissibility of the doctor opining “more likely than not”. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:25 am by Erin Miller
City of Chicago (08-1521) — incorporation of Second Amendment against the states Hui v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:35 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
July 26, 2018) (putative class action brought by emergency room doctors alleging, in a 210-page complaint, that opioid drug manufacturers and distributors contributed to the “opioid epidemic” by disseminating false and deceptive statements about the safety and effects of opioids in violation of RICO and state law) Grimes v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:11 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Negligence in a doctors medical practice, which is called malpractice, is the doctors failure to comply with the standard of care in the care and treatment of his/her patient. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Negligence in a doctor's medical practice, which is called malpractice, is the doctor's failure to comply with the standard of care in the care and treatment of his/her patient. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 am by Erin Miller
The Court heard argument yesterday in Samantar v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]