Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2018, 8:58 am
It's the third trial in the first Apple v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 9:29 am
Congress could have put the burden of policing infringement in suspicious circumstances on the provider, but it instead put it on the copyright holder. [read post]
12 May 2018, 2:58 pm
,Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
This symposium explores these and other issues.Keynote Lecture: James V Feinerman, Associate Dean for Transnational Programs, Co-Director, Georgetown Law Asia, and James M. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:22 am
Alternatively, Revenue Procedure 2018-27 states that an individual who receives a distribution from an HSA of an excess contribution (with earnings) based on the $6,850 deduction limit published in Rev. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:39 pm
Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Hartsock v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Hartsock v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
No. 16-341-JFB-SRF.United States District Court, D. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 2:06 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s analogy in her dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm
Quoting the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:45 am
Holder, in which a divided court struck down the formula used to determine which state and local governments must apply for approval from the federal government before making changes to their voting laws. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:38 am
§ 102 [2] Complaint, Solid Oak Sketches, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:25 am
See Auerbach v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 1:48 am
., United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:45 am
In the 2011 case NASA v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am
Someone wrote on Twitter that patent holders had something to celebrate yesterday: After the Supreme Court's Oil States (7-2 confirming constitutionality of PTAB inter partes review) and SAS (5-4 holding that PTAB must render decision on all challenged patent claims after granting review), patent holders were allegedly in a stronger position than before, which--as the same tweeter (I forgot the name) noted--is rarely the case when the Supreme Court overrules the… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:55 am
For example, in Mazer v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:46 am
These conditions are also cumulative (Gateway v OHIM, C‑57/08 P). [read post]
